Christ as History: Fr. Bernard Lonergan’s Christology, Part One

One wonders what Fr. Bernard Lonergan would have made of the short text we have known as the “gospel according to Mary Magdalen”, specifically the lords of the underworld (or lowlands) apparently revealed to her by the quasi-historical person we know as Jesus.  The first of these was known as Christ While historians are still… Continue reading Christ as History: Fr. Bernard Lonergan’s Christology, Part One

Techne and Poiesis; Techne and Episteme

(a response to an email from Ian Delairre) In this case I’m using the term poiesis in a fairly simple way, as anything that self-develops, rather than something that is developed intentionally, generally by man. Technology is an obvious case of techne, but if technology itself grows and develops, and is therefore not “controllable” (as… Continue reading Techne and Poiesis; Techne and Episteme

Mythos, Metaphysics, Technology, Science: Techne and Episteme.

I’ve been thinking about the relation between the epistemological and the technological a fair amount. As a mode of doing, techne is usually opposed with poiesis. However as a mode of knowing, its opposite was episteme. The basic difference between techne and episteme as knowing is temporal – techne looks forward, and tends therefore to… Continue reading Mythos, Metaphysics, Technology, Science: Techne and Episteme.

“Nothing happened … but everything’s different …”

In the transformations from one metaphysical period, or epoch, to another, precisely the inverse of the above statement occurred.  Everything changed, yet nothing was really different.  In keeping with metaphysics, the changes were mathematical, topological. How does it stand with the twisting out of metaphysics?  How could that change be itself seen? “Metamorphosis is a realized metaphor,… Continue reading “Nothing happened … but everything’s different …”

“Done done”

In some project I worked on in the past, I forget which now, we started distinguishing between whether a task was “done”, or “done done”.  It’s a useful distinction outside software development. Lately I’ve been feeling that I was done done as a software developer.  As people age, there’s a tendency to look back more… Continue reading “Done done”

Elegance in Programming

In the latest Pharo release (Pharo 5.0) there’s an optional library/plugin called StateSpec.  This is the author’s description: StateSpec is an object state specification framework. It describes particular object states by first class specifications. For example, there are SpecOfCollectionItem, SpecOfObjectClass and SpecOfObjectSuperclass. They can match and validate given objects. In case when an object doesn’t… Continue reading Elegance in Programming